Skip to main content



Tags helper for gradient evaluation.

Changes for 0.03 - 2024-03-27T17:18:08+01:00

  • API Change: Change 'height' and 'width' parameters to CSS unit.
  • Remove obsolete module use in test.
  • Remove usage of Tags::Output::Raw.
  • Rename example files to better names.
  • Update Module::Install to 1.21 version.
  • Update copyright years.


Multidimensional binning & histogramming

Changes for 0.028 - 2024-03-27T15:55:32+00:00

  • update requirement to Test::PDL 0.20 which handles badvals correctly


Tags helper for CPAN::Changes object.

Changes for 0.03 - 2024-03-27T16:29:45+01:00

  • Add test of constructor.
  • Fix minimal dependency to Tags::HTML.



Easily format content into PDF/PS/DVI with LaTeX templates.

Changes for 0.04 - 2024-03-27

  • Moved test file "t/400-format.t" into xt/ to be run only by 'author tests' because it was failing in many tester machines which lack LaTeX font and style files. In order for this test to succeed, all these missing LaTeX fonts and style files must be installed and that's not an option. Author tests can be run with "make authortest". Added two more unit tests "t/350-inmemory-template-usage-calling-other-templates.t" and "t/360-ondisk-template-usage-calling-other-templates.t". Enhanced documentation.


Does anybody know what happened with the package Catalyst::Plugin::FormValidator, why it was removed from cpan?

submitted by /u/ruzhnikov
[link] [comments]





SPVM Language

Changes for 0.989094 - 2023-03-26

  • Internal Changes
  • Bug Fix
  • Incompatible Changes






Perl Data Language

Changes for 2.085_02 - 2024-03-25

  • PP add loop(n=value) idiom to start not at 0
  • add whichover, inspired by https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77551179/perl-pdl-indexing-and-which
  • random/randsym only produce real data
  • fix dataflow when vaffine ndarray is between modified and downstream (#461) - thanks @vadim-160102 for continued reporting
  • revert the use of ArgOrder for PDL::Ops so op($a,$b,$c,$swap) works again as pre 2.082_01
  • error on inflating output ndarrays over dims sized 1 or implicit (promoted) or dummy, as is undefined behaviour
  • make HdrCode and FtrCode run when PMCode supplied (#463) - thanks @jo-37 for suggestion
  • PP add CHeader key
  • OtherPars can now be incomplete arrays of char*
  • make typemaps able to use more Perl ones like T_HVREF - thanks @jo-37
  • removed threadover_n alias since not used elsewhere and broadcastover{,_n} interface adjusted to move mandatory to start
  • add ccumu{prod,sum}over in complex double precision
  • setdims on ndarray with trans_parent (i.e. flowing) now an error
  • set(..., $multi_elt) now an error (#466) - thank @djerius for report
  • convert can work inplace (by using set_datatype)
  • flowing convert of ndarrays preserves badvalues that are NaN
  • PDL_ISBAD2 macro
  • lvalue {un,}broadcast
  • set_datatype now errors if has trans_children, as trans-es have a datatype
  • add ANYVAL_TO_ANYVAL_NEWTYPE
  • per-ndarray badvalues (which are PDL_Anyval) now constrained to be same type as ndarray
#461 #463 #466


Subroutine attribute for compile-time method lookups on its typed lexicals.


Invoke a callback on every element at every level of a data structure.

Changes for 0.03 - 2024-03-25T16:10:08-04:00

  • API CHANGE
  • ENHANCEMENTS


A Plugin to interface Form::Tiny with OptArgs2

Changes for 0.12 - 2024-03-25T15:42:38-04:00

  • ENHANCEMENT


Strawberry Perl is distributed with its own winlibs distribution. E.g., if the perl distribution is placed in c:/strawberry, the winlibs distribution is placed in c:/strawberry/c. May I replace this winlibs distribution with a different, newer winlibs distribution placed in c:/winlibs (for example)? Of course this will come with a path update.

submitted by /u/Sharp_Artichoke_8237
[link] [comments]



Microsoft Teams WebHook with AdaptiveCards for formatting notifications

Changes for 1.02 - 2024-03-25

  • fix test duration check failing in start/end


Libdeflate compression library

Changes for 0.07 - 2024-03-25

  • Update libdeflate to 1.20



module for checking taint peculiarities on some CPAN testers

Changes for 0.0.1 - 2024-03-25T03:15:44Z

  • original version


SPVM Language

Changes for 0.989093 - 2023-03-25

  • Bug Fix
  • Internal Changes
  • Test Cleanup




submitted by /u/niceperl
[link] [comments]



Simple backend-independent plotting for PDL

Changes for 1.010 - 2024-03-24

  • fix PGPLOT to read devices correctly


Basic method declarations with signatures, without source filters

Changes for 1.14 - 2024-03-24

  • Run number tests under C locale


PDL interface to the GNU Linear Programming Kit

Changes for 0.05 - 2024-03-24T12:33:00Z

  • enforce C99 standard


create Perl client SDKs from OpenAPI specs

Changes for 0.01 - 2024-03-24

  • Released on an unsuspecting world



Data objects for simple message.

Changes for 0.04 - 2024-03-23T21:17:46+01:00

  • Add minimal version of Mo::utils to code.
  • Rewrite to use of check_language_639_1().



Mo language utilities.

Changes for 0.05 - 2024-03-23T18:45:21+01:00

  • Add check_language_639_1() and check_language_639_2() checks.
  • Fix output of example in doc.


Invoke a callback on every element at every level of a data structure.

Changes for 0.01 - 2024-03-23T13:04:03-04:00

  • First release upon an unsuspecting world.


An effort to make creating and using custom web components easier

Changes for 0.07 - 2024-03-23T16:52:32Z

  • updates to better handle reverse proxy installations where generated urls were not being handled correctly



Random hash type objects.

Changes for 0.05 - 2024-03-22T19:10:24+01:00

  • Parameter 'num_generated' rewrite to use check_required().
  • Update to Data::HashType@0.05 without 'active' parameter.


This is the explanation of what happened to Perl Author : INGENICO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qw-gBQHa3RY&list=LL&index=1

submitted by /u/todo_bem
[link] [comments]



Locate and read records from human-edited data tables (Excel, CSV)

Changes for 0.013 - 2024-03-22

  • Fix bug in unit tests causing failure when MRO::Compat not installed


Data objects for hash type.

Changes for 0.05 - 2024-03-22T17:25:32+01:00

  • API CHANGE: Parameter 'active' is removed.
  • API CHANGE: Parameter 'valid_from' is required.
  • Fix dependencies.



CPAN.pm plugin for installing external dependencies

Changes for 0.77 - 2024-03-22

  • support for rpm --whatprovides
  • new test script rpm.t


Popping a selection list relative to a widget

Changes for 0.07

  • fixed calculation of listbox height.



Random hash type objects.

Changes for 0.04 - 2024-03-22T16:08:10+01:00

  • Add tests for valid_from.
  • Regen documentation and example.


I've finally had some more time to do some real work related to perl.social again, and there was a recent question from someone again about me actually adopting a proper ToS/CoC there.

I'm not a lawyer so I've decided as a starting point that looking at similar communities out there and so I've grabbed the Mastodon CoC to start the discussion. I do not want to wholesale put anything into place without input from the community, so I'm going to start a discussion here and on perl.social (I'll edit a link to the post once I make it).


COC/TOS

Borrowing many things from the Mastodon CoC as a astarting point (https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).

I am removing a few things from it, not because I don't think they're good ideas or anything but also because I want to limit the scope of the initial discussion and the amount of work for myself as I'm still currently the only moderator but once the community there gets larger or it changes that I'm not the only one maintaining things, we will hold another discussion about everything.

I've changed a few things also, specifically to add stronger language that any moderators MUST document why an action was taken. This doesn't necessarily mean that I believe that those reasons must be immediately given to an affected user, but that they must be available when requested. Specifically I'm thinking of not informing in the context of bots, spam, illegal or otherwise legally actionable content (i.e. something that's going to get me a subpeona or court case).

Other proposed ideas: 1) Some kind of regular discussion, maybe annually? on ToS/CoC type things 1a) The idea being that we require a regular discussion of anything that's happened over the last time period to avoid it being possible for something happening being "swept under the rug" or "falling through the cracks" because it didn't get the proper time given to it previously. How this should be done I have no good recommendations for, likely creating a group on perl.social to host the conversation each time? 2) ?

Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct

Our Pledge


We as members, contributors, and leaders pledge to make participation in our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming, diverse, inclusive, and healthy community.

Privacy


I reserve the right to collect email or other identifiable contact information, and it will never be shared to an outside party without consent except in the case of it being required by some legal process. If at any time perl.social becomes a larger organization and there is a desire to change this, I will require the removal of all such information until explicit consent is given again with such a new policy. I don't know if there's a way I can make this legally enforcable but I see it as something I do not own and therefore cannot ethically give it to another party in that kind of scenario.

Both perl.social and I are located in the USA, and therefore I believe are not directly subject to the GDPR, but as there are similar laws in other jurisdictions even within the USA, and I basically agree with the ideas involved, I will do whatever is reasonable feasible to follow them.

Our Standards


Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our community include:

  • Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences
  • Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback
  • Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes, and learning from the experience
  • Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the overall community

Examples of unacceptable behavior include:

  • The use of public and/or unwanted sexualized language or imagery, and sexual attention or advances of any kind. Consenting adults in private should be acceptable.
  • Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
  • Public or private harassment
  • Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or email address, without their explicit permission
  • Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting


Enforcement Responsibilities


Community leaders are responsible for clarifying and enforcing our standards of acceptable behavior and will take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to any behavior that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, or harmful.

Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and MUST communicate reasons for moderation decisions.

Scope


This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, and also applies when an individual is officially representing the community in public spaces. Examples of representing our community include using an official e-mail address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed representative at an online or offline event.

Enforcement


Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement at [hello@joinmastodon.org](mailto:hello@joinmastodon.org). All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.

All community leaders are obligated to respect the privacy and security of the reporter of any incident.

Enforcement Guidelines


Community leaders will follow these Community Impact Guidelines in determining the consequences for any action they deem in violation of this Code of Conduct:

1. Correction


Community Impact: Use of inappropriate language or other behavior deemed unprofessional or unwelcome in the community.

Consequence: A private, written warning from community leaders, providing clarity around the nature of the violation and an explanation of why the behavior was inappropriate. A public apology may be requested.

2. Warning


Community Impact: A violation through a single incident or series of actions.

Consequence: A warning with consequences for continued behavior. No interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, for a specified period of time. This includes avoiding interactions in community spaces as well as external channels like social media. Violating these terms may lead to a temporary or permanent ban.

3. Temporary Ban


Community Impact: A serious violation of community standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior.

Consequence: A temporary ban from any sort of interaction or public communication with the community for a specified period of time. No public or private interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, is allowed during this period. Violating these terms may lead to a permanent ban.

4. Permanent Ban


Community Impact: Demonstrating a pattern of violation of community standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior, harassment of an individual, or aggression toward or disparagement of classes of individuals.

Consequence: A permanent ban from any sort of public interaction within the community.

Attribution


This Code of Conduct is adapted from the Contributor Covenant, version 2.1, available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct.html.

And from the Mastodon code of conduct available at https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Community Impact Guidelines were inspired by Mozilla's code of conduct enforcement ladder.

For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see the FAQ at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq. Translations are available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations.

submitted by /u/simcop2387
[link] [comments]



Data objects for login.

Changes for 0.03 - 2024-03-22T14:37:07+01:00

  • API CHANGE: Add 'valid_from' and 'valid_to' parameters to Data::Login.
  • API CHANGE: Add 'valid_from' and 'valid_to' parameters to Data::Login::Role. 'active' parameter will be removed in future. And 'valid_from' will be required in future.
  • Add DESCRIPTION section to Data::Login doc.


Perl.social Code of Conduct


I've posted this on reddit and wanted a discussion here too for those not on reddit for whatever reason:

https://www.reddit.com/r/perl/comments/1bl0sw1/perlsocial_code_of_conducttos_discussion/

The gist though is that I've gotten another request for a proper CoC/ToS that would be acceptable to the community since i've been negligent in doing so. I've decided that a slightly modified version from the mastodon CoC might be a good starting point and I'll post that content in a reply to this so that it doesn't flood everyone's feeds with a giant wall of text immediately.

in reply to Ryan Voots

COC/TOS

Borrowing many things from the Mastodon CoC as a astarting point (https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).

I am removing a few things from it, not because I don't think they're good ideas or anything but also because I want to limit the scope
of the initial discussion and the amount of work for myself as I'm still currently the only moderator but once the community there gets larger
or it changes that I'm not the only one maintaining things, we will hold another discussion about everything.

I've changed a few things also, specifically to add stronger language that any moderators
MUST document why an action was taken. This doesn't necessarily mean that I believe
that those reasons must be immediately given to an affected user, but that they must
be available when requested. Specifically I'm thinking of not informing in the context
of bots, spam, illegal or otherwise legally actionable content (i.e. something that's going to get me a subpeona or court case).

Other proposed ideas:
1) Some kind of regular discussion, maybe annually? on ToS/CoC type things
1a) The idea being that we require a regular discussion of anything that's
happened over the last time period to avoid it being possible for something
happening being "swept under the rug" or "falling through the cracks" because
it didn't get the proper time given to it previously. How this should be done
I have no good recommendations for, likely creating a group on perl.social to
host the conversation each time?
2) ?

Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct

Our Pledge


We as members, contributors, and leaders pledge to make participation in our
community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender
identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status,
nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual
identity and orientation.

We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming,
diverse, inclusive, and healthy community.

Privacy


I reserve the right to collect email or other identifiable contact information,
and it will never be shared to an outside party without consent except in the case
of it being required by some legal process. If at any time perl.social becomes
a larger organization and there is a desire to change this, I will require the
removal of all such information until explicit consent is given again with such
a new policy. I don't know if there's a way I can make this legally enforcable
but I see it as something I do not own and therefore cannot ethically give it to
another party in that kind of scenario.

Both perl.social and I are located in the USA, and therefore I believe are not
directly subject to the GDPR, but as there are similar laws in other jurisdictions
even within the USA, and I basically agree with the ideas involved, I will do
whatever is reasonable feasible to follow them.

Our Standards


Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our
community include:

  • Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences
  • Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback
  • Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes,
    and learning from the experience
  • Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the overall
    community

Examples of unacceptable behavior include:

  • The use of public and/or unwanted sexualized language or imagery,
    and sexual attention or advances of any kind. Consenting adults in private
    should be acceptable.
  • Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
  • Public or private harassment
  • Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or email address,
    without their explicit permission
  • Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
    professional setting


Enforcement Responsibilities


Community leaders are responsible for clarifying and enforcing our standards of
acceptable behavior and will take appropriate and fair corrective action in
response to any behavior that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive,
or harmful.

Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are
not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and MUST communicate reasons for moderation
decisions.

Scope


This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, and also applies when
an individual is officially representing the community in public spaces.
Examples of representing our community include using an official e-mail address,
posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed
representative at an online or offline event.

Enforcement


Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement at
[hello@joinmastodon.org](mailto:hello@joinmastodon.org).
All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.

All community leaders are obligated to respect the privacy and security of the
reporter of any incident.

Enforcement Guidelines


Community leaders will follow these Community Impact Guidelines in determining
the consequences for any action they deem in violation of this Code of Conduct:

1. Correction


Community Impact: Use of inappropriate language or other behavior deemed
unprofessional or unwelcome in the community.

Consequence: A private, written warning from community leaders, providing
clarity around the nature of the violation and an explanation of why the
behavior was inappropriate. A public apology may be requested.

2. Warning


Community Impact: A violation through a single incident or series of
actions.

Consequence: A warning with consequences for continued behavior. No
interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with
those enforcing the Code of Conduct, for a specified period of time. This
includes avoiding interactions in community spaces as well as external channels
like social media. Violating these terms may lead to a temporary or permanent
ban.

3. Temporary Ban


Community Impact: A serious violation of community standards, including
sustained inappropriate behavior.

Consequence: A temporary ban from any sort of interaction or public
communication with the community for a specified period of time. No public or
private interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction
with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, is allowed during this period.
Violating these terms may lead to a permanent ban.

4. Permanent Ban


Community Impact: Demonstrating a pattern of violation of community
standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior, harassment of an
individual, or aggression toward or disparagement of classes of individuals.

Consequence: A permanent ban from any sort of public interaction within the
community.

Attribution


This Code of Conduct is adapted from the Contributor Covenant,
version 2.1, available at
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct.htmlhttps://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct.html.

And from the Mastodon code of conduct available at https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Community Impact Guidelines were inspired by
Mozilla's code of conduct enforcement ladder.

For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see the FAQ at
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faqhttps://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq. Translations are available at
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translationshttps://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations.